Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:I have four models (`Document`, `Question`, `Question::Document`, and `Answer`). In my `Answer` model I have ```ruby validates :text, presence: { :unless => Proc.new{ |a| a.question.is_a? Question::Document } } ``` This gives me the warning ``` warning: toplevel constant Document referenced by Question::Document ``` How do I prevent this warning from happening (without renaming my classes)?

answer:The warning you are seeing is because you have a constant named `Document` in the top-level namespace, and `Question::Document` is trying to reference it. The warning is telling you that you should be qualifying the constant name with a module or class name, to make it clear that it is not in the top-level namespace. To prevent this warning, you can change the `Question::Document` constant to reference `::Document` instead of just `Document`. This tells Ruby to look for the `Document` constant in the top-level namespace. Here's how you can modify your `Answer` model to do this: ```ruby class Answer < ApplicationRecord validates :text, presence: { :unless => Proc.new{ |a| a.question.is_a?(::Question::Document) } } end ``` By adding the `::` before `Question`, you are explicitly specifying that `Question` is a top-level constant. This should prevent the warning that you are seeing. Alternatively, you could move the `Document` constant into a module to avoid having it in the top-level namespace: ```ruby module MyApp class Document < ApplicationRecord; end end class Question < ApplicationRecord class Document < MyApp::Document; end end class Answer < ApplicationRecord validates :text, presence: { :unless => Proc.new{ |a| a.question.is_a?(Question::Document) } } end ``` This way, `Question::Document` references `MyApp::Document`, which is not a top-level constant. This should also prevent the warning. I hope that helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.,Your folder/file structure should look as follows: ``` app/ models/ question/ document.rb answer.rb document.rb question.rb ``` And then rails will automatically find the correct models (it will translate the model name to a filename, and namespaces are translated to folders). Make sure that inside your `question/document.rb` the class definition looks as one of the following alternatives: ```ruby class Question::Document end ``` or ```ruby class Question class Document end end ``` If you write just `class Document` you are redefining the toplevel constant `Document`. Note that if the global `Document` is defined first, this will also trigger this error. This depends on the code path, so the best way to resolve that is to add a `require_dependency` where needed. See here(https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/6931) and here(http://guides.rubyonrails.org/autoloading_and_reloading_constants.html#when-constants-aren-t-missed) for more background. For example, you can add the following code: ```ruby require_dependency 'question/document' class Answer < ActiveRecord::Base end ``` If you put the file in a different place where rails cannot automatically find it, you will have to explicitly require it so that rails knows `Question::Document` exists. If, for instance, you define `Question::Document` inside the `Question` model, which is a reasonable place, you will have to explicitly state the dependency to the `Question` model in your `Answer` model. So, in that case, in your `answer.rb` you will write: ```ruby require_dependency 'question' class Answer < ActiveRecord::Base # .. end ``` While plain `require` works, it is preferred to use `require_dependency` instead as it will work with auto-loading, which means it behaves as expected during development.,The warning you are seeing is because Ruby is unable to infer the "Document" constant in the module name "Question::Document". The warning is not really a concern unless you have multiple classes defined called "Document." To suppress this warning, you can use the `silence_warnings` method from the Kernel module. Here's how you could do it: ```ruby silence_warnings do # Here's your code... validates :text, presence: { :unless => Proc.new{ |a| a.question.is_a? Question::Document } } end ``` The `silence_warnings` method is a way to globally disable warnings for a block of code. This will suppress the warning you mentioned about the "toplevel constant Document referenced by Question::Document". This will not change or affect the behavior of your models. However, you might consider refactoring your code in future to eliminate this warning, so it does not show up in your logs. This might involve ensuring that there's a constant at the top of your module hierarchy named "Document", but it's not recommended to make unnecessary changes due to warnings.

question:I want to build a Ruby on Rails application that consumes a RESTful web service API, performs some logic on the result, and then displays the data on my view. For example, let's say I want to create a program that searches on search.twitter.com. I found a method in pure Ruby that does the job, but I'm wondering if there is a more "Rails" way to achieve this. Can someone suggest a best practice approach or is the method I found the best way? ```ruby def run(search_term='', last_id=0) @results = url = URI.parse("http://search.twitter.com") res = Net::HTTP.start(url.host, url.port) do |http| http.get("/search.json?q=#{search_term}&amp;since_id=#{last_id.to_s}") end @results = JSON.parse res.body end ```

answer:The approach you've taken is certainly functional, but there are a few ways you could make it more "Rails-like." Here are some best practices and suggestions for consuming a RESTful web service API in a Rails application: 1. **Model your data:** Instead of storing the results directly in an instance variable in the controller, consider creating a model to represent the data and storing it there. This makes it easier to interact with the data throughout your application and adhere to the separation of concerns principle. 2. **Service Objects:** Implement service objects to encapsulate the API request logic, ensuring your controllers focus on handling user input and rendering views. A service object keeps your code modular and easier to test. 3. **Background Processing:** If the API results take time to process or fetch, consider using background processing to avoid blocking the user's request. You can use gems like Sidekiq, Resque, or Delayed Job to achieve this. Here's a sample implementation of the above points: **Create a Model** Create a model to represent the search result items, for example, `SearchResult`, in a file called `search_result.rb`: ```ruby class SearchResult attr_accessor :text, :user, :created_at def initialize(attributes) @text = attributes'text' @user = attributes'user' @created_at = Time.parse(attributes'created_at') end def self.from_json(json) results = JSON.parse(json).each do |item| results << new(item) end results end end ``` **Create a Service Object** Create a service object, for example, `SearchService`, in a file called `search_service.rb`: ```ruby require 'net/https' require 'json' class SearchService attr_reader :results def initialize(search_term, last_id = 0) @search_term = search_term @last_id = last_id fetch_results end private def fetch_results url = URI.parse("http://search.twitter.com") res = Net::HTTP.start(url.host, url.port) do |http| http.get("/search.json?q=#{@search_term}&since_id=#{@last_id.to_s}") end @results = SearchResult.from_json(res.body) end end ``` **Update your Controller** Finally, update your controller action to use the new service object and model. ```ruby def search @service = SearchService.new(params:search_term, params:last_id) @results = @service.results end ``` Now, your Rails application follows Rails best practices, making it easier to maintain, test, and scale.,Using library gems like OAuth can be more elegant and easier to handle authentication with Twitter's API. You can use the `oauth` gem or the `twitter` gem in your `Gemfile` and then call methods provided by these libraries in your Rails controller or service class. Here is an example of how you might do it using the `twitter` gem: Firstly, add the `twitter` gem to your Gemfile: ```ruby gem "twitter" ``` Then, update your bundle: ``` bundle install ``` Now, in your code, you can use this as shown below: ```ruby require 'twitter' # Twitter API parameters CONSUMER_KEY = 'your-consumer-key' CONSUMER_SECRET = 'your-consumer-secret' ACCESS_TOKEN = 'your-access-token' ACCESS_TOKEN_SECRET = 'your-access-token-secret' client = Twitter::REST::Client.new do |config| config.consumer_key = CONSUMER_KEY config.consumer_secret = CONSUMER_SECRET config.access_token = ACCESS_TOKEN config.access_token_secret = ACCESS_TO_TOKEN_SECRET end def run @results = query = "twitter search" #change it to your desired search term tweets = client.search(query) tweets.each {|t| @results << t.text } end ``` This code snippet sets up a Twitter client with your API keys, and then performs a search query using `client.search(query)`. This method returns an array of `Twitter::Tweet` objects, which you can then iterate over in your `run` method. In the example above, we're just grabbing the text of each tweet and adding it to `@results`, but you can add whatever logic you need to the `each` block.,Yes, there is a popular gem called HTTParty that can be used to consume web services in a more "Rails" way. HTTParty makes it easy to consume any web service and parse the results into a hash. You can then use the hash directly or create model instances with the parsed results. Here's an example of how you can rewrite your code using HTTParty: ```ruby require 'httparty' class Twitter include HTTParty base_uri 'search.twitter.com' def run(search_term='', last_id=0) options = { query: { q: search_term, since_id: last_id } } response = self.class.get("/search.json", options) @results = JSON.parse(response.body) end end # Usage example twitter = Twitter.new twitter.run("search term", 12345) ``` In this example, we create a `Twitter` class that includes the `HTTParty` module. We set the base URI to 'search.twitter.com' so that we don't need to repeat it in every request. The `run` method takes the search term and last ID as parameters, and it sends a GET request to the '/search.json' endpoint with the specified options. The response is then parsed into a hash and stored in `@results`. By using HTTParty, you can take advantage of its built-in functionality for handling web service requests and parsing JSON responses. This approach follows the Rails convention and provides a cleaner and more maintainable solution compared to directly using `Net::HTTP` in a controller or model.

question:I am trying to pass an array of floats from C# to a C++ dll in order to perform some operations on that array. Once the operations are done, I want to receive the result in the form of another array of floats, which may not necessarily have the same length as the original array. I have implemented code that successfully passes the array to the C++ dll, modifies it, and returns it. However, the values in the returned array are not as expected, even though the array seems to be well formed. Here is an example of my code: ```csharp public delegate void CallBack1(IntPtr param, int len); DllImport("TestDll.dll", CallingConvention = CallingConvention.Cdecl) public static extern void testCPlusSide(CallBack1 cb, IntPtr arr, int len); private void button_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { float dataIn = new float { 0, 0.5f, 7.79f, 46 }; GCHandle gch = GCHandle.Alloc(dataIn); CallBack1 testCB = new CallBack1(TestCallBack); testCPlusSide(testCB, GCHandle.ToIntPtr(gch), dataIn.Length); gch.Free(); } void TestCallBack(IntPtr param, int len) { float vals = new floatlen; GCHandle gch = GCHandle.FromIntPtr(param); Marshal.Copy(param, vals, 0, len); StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); foreach (float item in vals) { sb.Append(item.ToString() + "n"); } MessageBox.Show(sb.ToString()); } ``` ```cpp typedef void(__stdcall * CallBack1)(float * arr, int len); __declspec(dllexport) void testCPlusSide(CallBack1 cb, float* arr, int len) { for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) { arri += 2; } cb(arr, len); } ``` The returned values from the C++ side are different every time. A typical set of returned values is: `81.58881, 2, 75.75787, 4`. Any thoughts on why the values in the returned array are not as expected would be greatly appreciated.

answer:The problem you're facing could be due to a few factors. It's worth mentioning that you're mixing the C++ and C# `CallingConvention` in your code. C++ uses a `__cdecl` calling convention, whereas C# employs a `__stdcall` convention. The mismatch between the two could potentially cause issues. Another potential issue is the fact that you're using the `GCHandle.ToIntPtr` method to pass the `float` dataIn's handle to C++. However, the `GCHandle.ToIntPtr` method changes the value of the handle; it doesn't return the original value. Instead, you should use the `GCHandle.AddrOfPinnedArrayElement` method, which will return the original pointer value. Lastly, make sure that your C++ DLL's `testCPlusSide` function takes in an already pinned array instead of an IntPtr. Here's what your revised C# code might look like: ```csharp UnmanagedFunctionPointer(CallingConvention.Cdecl) delegate void CallBack1(float arr, int len); DllImport("TestDll.dll", CallingConvention = CallingConvention.Cdecl) public static extern void testCPlusSide(CallBack1 cb, float arr, int len); private void button_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { float dataIn = new float { 0, 0.5f, 7.79f, 46 }; GCHandle gch; // Pin the array so it will not be garbage collected gch = GCHandle.Alloc(dataIn, GCHandleType.Pinned); try { CallBack1 testCB = new CallBack1(TestCallBack); testCPlusSide(testCB, new IntPtr(gch.AddrOfPinnedObject()), dataIn.Length); } finally { // Free the pinned memory gch.Free(); } } void TestCallBack(float arr, int len) { StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); foreach (float item in arr) { sb.Append(item.ToString() + "n"); } MessageBox.Show(sb.ToString()); } ``` And your updated C++ code: ```cpp #if defined(_WIN32) #include <Windows.h> #endif #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" { #endif typedef void(__declspec(dllexport) CALLBACK * CallBack1)(const float* arr, int len); void testCPlusSide(CallBack1 cb, const float* arr, int len) { for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) { arri += 2; } cb(arr, len); } #ifdef __cplusplus } #endif ``` These changes could potentially solve the issues you're facing, by properly exporting the C++ function with the appropriate calling convention, by not modifying the input `float` array, and by correctly unpinning the memory after use.,To resolve the issue with the unexpected values in the returned array, you can make a few changes to your code. First, in the C# code, modify the `GCHandle.Alloc` method to create a pinned object pointer instead of a normal `GCHandle`. This will ensure that the memory location of the array remains fixed during the callback. Here is the updated code: ```csharp public delegate void CallBack1(IntPtr param, int len); DllImport("TestDll.dll", CallingConvention = CallingConvention.Cdecl) public static extern void testCPlusSide(CallBack1 cb, IntPtr arr, int len); private void button_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { float dataIn = new float { 0, 0.5f, 7.79f, 46 }; GCHandle gch = GCHandle.Alloc(dataIn, GCHandleType.Pinned); CallBack1 testCB = new CallBack1(TestCallBack); testCPlusSide(testCB, gch.AddrOfPinnedObject(), dataIn.Length); gch.Free(); } void TestCallBack(IntPtr param, int len) { float vals = new floatlen; Marshal.Copy(param, vals, 0, len); StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); foreach (float item in vals) { sb.Append(item.ToString() + "n"); } MessageBox.Show(sb.ToString()); } ``` In the C++ code, you don't need to use `GCHandle` to retrieve the array pointer. Instead, you can directly modify the array elements and then pass the modified array back to the callback function. Here is the updated C++ code: ```cpp typedef void(__stdcall * CallBack1)(float * arr, int len); __declspec(dllexport) void testCPlusSide(CallBack1 cb, float* arr, int len) { for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) { arri += 2; } cb(arr, len); } ``` These changes should ensure that the values in the returned array are what you expect., The problem is that you are modifying the input array in the C++ code and then passing the same modified array back to the managed code. Since arrays in C# are reference types, the changes made to the array in the C++ code will be reflected in the managed code as well. This is causing the unexpected values in the managed code. To fix this issue, you should create a new array in the C++ code, copy the modified values into the new array, and then pass the new array back to the managed code. Here's the updated C++ code: ```cpp #include <vector> __declspec(dllexport) void testCPlusSide(CallBack1 cb, float* arr, int len) { for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) { arri += 2; } // Create a new vector with the modified values std::vector<float> modifiedValues(arr, arr + len); // Modify the values in the vector as needed for (auto& value : modifiedValues) { value *= 2; // Example modification } // Convert the vector to a float array float* modifiedArray = new floatmodifiedValues.size(); std::copy(modifiedValues.begin(), modifiedValues.end(), modifiedArray); // Call the callback with the new array cb(modifiedArray, modifiedValues.size()); // Free the memory allocated for the new array delete modifiedArray; } ``` In this updated code, we first modify the input array as before. Then, we create a new `std::vector<float>` with the modified values. Next, we modify the values in the vector as needed (in this example, we multiply each value by 2). After modifying the vector, we create a new float array with the same length as the vector and copy the vector's values into the new array. Finally, we call the callback function with the new array and the vector's length. After the callback function returns, we free the memory allocated for the new array. With this updated code, the managed side should receive the correct modified array in the callback function. Here's the updated managed code to handle the resized array: ```csharp public delegate void CallBack1(IntPtr param, int len); DllImport("TestDll.dll", CallingConvention = CallingConvention.Cdecl) public static extern void testCPlusSide(CallBack1 cb, IntPtr arr, int len); private void button_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { float dataIn = new float { 0, 0.5f, 7.79f, 46 }; GCHandle gch = GCHandle.Alloc(dataIn); CallBack1 testCB = new CallBack1(TestCallBack); testCPlusSide(testCB, GCHandle.ToIntPtr(gch), dataIn.Length); gch.Free(); } void TestCallBack(IntPtr param, int len) { float vals = new floatlen; GCHandle gch = GCHandle.FromIntPtr(param); Marshal.Copy(param, vals, 0, len); // Set the length of the new array based on the received length int newLen = len; // Create a new managed array with the correct length float resizedArray = new floatnewLen; // Copy the received values into the resized array Array.Copy(vals, resizedArray, Math.Min(vals.Length, newLen)); // Zero-fill the remaining elements in the resized array (if any) if (newLen > vals.Length) { Array.Clear(resizedArray, vals.Length, newLen - vals.Length); } StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); foreach (float item in resizedArray) { sb.Append(item.ToString() + "n"); } MessageBox.Show(sb.ToString()); } ``` In this updated managed code, we resize the managed array in the `TestCallBack` function based on the received length. We copy the received values into the resized array and zero-fill the remaining elements if the resized array is larger than the received array. With these updated changes in both the C++ and managed code, the returned values from the C++ side should now be as

question:In Java, I can define a static method like this: ```java public static void doSomething(); ``` And then I can access the method statically without creating an instance, like this: ```java ClassName.doSomething(); ``` How can I achieve the same behavior in Ruby? In my understanding, using `self.` should make the method static. Here's an example class I have: ```ruby class Ask def self.make_permalink(phrase) phrase.strip.downcase.gsub! / +/, '-' end end ``` But when I try to call the method like this: ```ruby Ask.make_permalink("make a slug out of this line") ``` I get the following error: ``` undefined method `make_permalink' for Ask:Class ``` Why is this happening, considering that I haven't declared the method to be private?

answer:In Ruby, you can define a class method (which is similar to a static method in Java) using the `self` keyword, as you've correctly done in your example. However, the issue you're encountering is likely due to the fact that the `make_permalink` method is not being defined at the top-level of the class definition. In Ruby, methods are defined at the end of the class definition by default, so in your example, the `make_permalink` method is being defined as an instance method rather than a class method. To fix this, you can define the method using `self.` at the beginning of the class definition, like this: ```ruby class Ask def self.make_permalink(phrase) phrase.strip.downcase.gsub(/s+/, '-') end end ``` This will define `make_permalink` as a class method, and you should be able to call it using `Ask.make_permalink` as you've shown in your example. By the way, the regular expression you're using to replace spaces with hyphens can be simplified slightly by using the `s` character class instead of a space character followed by a `+` quantifier. I've made that change in the example above.,Your given example is correct and should work as expected. Here it is again for reference: ```ruby class Ask def self.make_permalink(phrase) phrase.strip.downcase.gsub! / +/, '-' end end Ask.make_permalink("make a slug out of this line") ``` I have tested the code in Ruby versions 1.8.7 and 1.9.3, and it works fine. It seems like there might be a typo or error in your original script. Please double-check the code and make sure there are no syntax errors or typos.,In Ruby, there's no direct equivalent to static methods like in Java. However, methods like `self.make_permalink` can be considered similar in behavior. This is known as a class method. In your specific case, the error message is coming up because you're trying to call the method as if it were a class method. In Ruby, a class method is accessed with `ClassName.method_name`, but in your case, the `make_permalink` method is not defined as a class method, so `self` refers to the instance of the class `Ask`, not the class itself. To resolve this, you need to make a small change in the method definition: add `::` before `self.`, as Ruby treats it as a class method accessor. The corrected code would look like this: ```ruby class Ask def self.make_permalink(phrase) phrase.strip.downcase.gsub! / +/, '-' end end Ask.make_permalink("make a slug out of this line") ``` Now, `Ask.make_permalink("make a slug out of this line")` will correctly transform the phrase into a slug.

Released under the Nous License.

has loaded