answer:To determine which sentence does not make sense, let's analyze the meaning and context of each sentence: - Sentence A: "Traffic on the highway made me late for work." This sentence makes sense because traffic is a common cause of delays, and being late for work is a negative consequence of traffic. People are usually affected by traffic when going from one place to another, such as commuting to work. - Sentence B: "Traffic on the highway made me a loaf of bread." This sentence does not make sense because traffic is an issue related to transportation or movement along a road, not a factor that can make someone become a loaf of bread. The relationship between traffic and turning a person into a loaf of bread is not logical or coherent, making it an illogical sentence. Therefore, Sentence B: "Traffic on the highway made me a loaf of bread" is the option that does not make sense.,To determine which sentence does not make sense, we need to analyze the logical connections between the subjects and actions in each sentence. Sentence A: "Traffic on the highway made me late for work" - Subject: Traffic on the highway - Action: Made me late for work In this sentence, traffic on the highway can cause delays, which in turn can make someone late for work. This is a logical connection between the subject and the action, so this sentence makes sense. Sentence B: "Traffic on the highway made me a loaf of bread" - Subject: Traffic on the highway - Action: Made me a loaf of bread In this sentence, traffic on the highway is not related to making a loaf of bread. There is no logical connection between the subject and the action, so this sentence does not make sense. Conclusion: Sentence B ("Traffic on the highway made me a loaf of bread") does not make sense., To determine which of the two sentences does not make sense, let's analyze them one by one. Sentence A: "Traffic on the highway made me late for work" This sentence is logically and contextually coherent. Traffic congestion can cause delays, and being late for work because of traffic is a common experience. Sentence B: "Traffic on the highway made me a loaf of bread" This sentence, on the other hand, does not make sense. The concept of traffic causing someone or something to become a loaf of bread is illogical and lacks contextual coherence. Traffic congestion cannot physically or metaphorically turn something into a loaf of bread. The answer is Sentence B: "Traffic on the highway made me a loaf of bread" does not make sense.

answer:- yes Explanation: 1. Errol Flynn was a famous actor known for his roles in swashbuckler films. 2. One of his most notable roles was that of Robin Hood in the 1938 film "The Adventures of Robin Hood." 3. The film was a major success and is considered a classic in the adventure genre. 4. Therefore, it is a factual statement that Errol Flynn played Robin Hood in films.,Step 1: Identify the main subject and claim in the statement The main subject in the statement is Errol Flynn, and the claim is that he played Robin Hood in films. Step 2: Research the claim To determine if this statement is factual, we need to research whether Errol Flynn indeed played the role of Robin Hood in films. Step 3: Find relevant information After conducting research, we find that Errol Flynn played the role of Robin Hood in the 1938 film "The Adventures of Robin Hood." Step 4: Compare the claim with the gathered information We have found evidence that supports the claim that Errol Flynn played Robin Hood in a film. Step 5: Conclude the answer Based on the information gathered, we can conclude that the statement "Errol Flynn played Robin Hood in films" is factual. Answer: yes,Yes, the statement "Errol Flynn played Robin Hood in films" is a factual statement. Step-by-step justification: 1. "Errol Flynn" refers to an Australian-American actor who was famous during the Golden Age of Hollywood. 2. "Robin Hood" is a legendary archer and hero, whose story is set in England during the period. 3. "Played" means that Errol Flynn portrayed the character Robin Hood. 4. "Films" are movies, a form of visual storytelling through recordings. 5. Errol Flynn indeed played the character of Robin Hood in the 1938 film "The Adventures of Robin Hood," directed by Michael Curtiz and William Keighley. Therefore, the statement is factually accurate.

answer:Sure, let's break this down step by step. 1. First, we need to understand the ratio of iced tea to lemonade in one drink. The recipe calls for 1/4 cup of iced tea and 1 + 1/4 = 1.25 cups of lemonade. 2. Therefore, the ratio of iced tea to lemonade is 1/4 : 1.25. 3. To find out how much lemonade is in 18 cups of the drink, we first need to determine how many drinks are in 18 cups. 4. Since there's 1/4 cup of iced tea in one drink, and 18 cups is 18/4 = 4.5 gallons (or 72 1/4 cups), we can see that we can make 72 / 1.25 = 57.6 drinks with 18 cups. Since we can't have a fraction of a drink, we'll round this down to 57 drinks. 5. Now, we can calculate the amount of lemonade in 57 drinks by multiplying the amount of lemonade in one drink (1.25 cups) by 57. 6. Doing this calculation, we get 1.25 * 57 = 71.25 cups. So, if Abigail fills a pitcher with 18 total cups of this drink, there would be approximately 71.25 cups of lemonade in the pitcher, assuming the pitcher can hold a fraction of a cup. If we need a whole number of cups, then we could say there are 71 cups of lemonade, knowing that there's a slight bit of extra iced tea in the pitcher.,Abigail is making a drink using 1/4 cup of iced tea and 1 + 1/4 cup (or 5/4 cup) of lemonade. To find out how many cups of lemonade are in the pitcher, we need to determine how many "units" of this recipe are in the pitcher. Following are the steps: 1. Let 'x' be the number of drinks Abigail is making in the pitcher. 2. She's making 1 drink per unit and each drink has a total of 1 + 1/4 + 1/4 = 5/4 cups of liquid. 3. The total amount of liquid in the pitcher is 18 cups. 4. Using the formula x = (total amount of liquid) / (liquid per drink): x = 18 cups / 5/4 cups/per drink. 5. Calculate the value of 'x' (the number of drinks): x = (18 * 4) / 5 = 72 / 5 = 14.4. Since we cannot have a fraction of a drink, we can round up 'x' to the nearest whole number, which is 15. Therefore, the pitcher contains 15 cups of lemonade. This is the reasoning behind the answer of '15'.,To determine how many cups of lemonade are in the pitcher, we need to first find out how much of the drink is made up of lemonade in a single serving and then scale that up to 18 cups. Step 1: Calculate the total amount of iced tea and lemonade in one serving. 1/4 cup of iced tea + 1 and 1/4 cup of lemonade = 1/4 + 1 + 1/4 = 1/2 + 1 = 1 and 1/2 cups Step 2: Calculate the proportion of lemonade in one serving. The proportion of lemonade in one serving is 1 and 1/4 cups of lemonade per 1 and 1/2 cups of drink. To find the proportion, divide the amount of lemonade by the total amount of the drink. (1 and 1/4) / (1 and 1/2) = (1 + 1/4) / (1 + 1/2) = (5/4) / (3/2) = (5/4) * (2/3) = 10/12 = 5/6 Step 3: Calculate the amount of lemonade in 18 cups of the drink. The proportion of lemonade in the drink is 5/6, so to find the amount of lemonade in 18 cups, multiply the proportion by 18. (5/6) * 18 = 5 * 3 = 15 So, there are 15 cups of lemonade in the pitcher. The reasoning is that we found the proportion of lemonade in a single serving of the drink and then multiplied that proportion by the total number of cups (18) to find the amount of lemonade in the entire pitcher.

answer:Cattle farmers raise cattle for various purposes, one of which is producing leather. Drum makers often use different types of animal hides, including cowhide, to create drumheads. Therefore, a cattle farmer could be a source of materials for a drum maker. The answer is: yes., A cattle farmer raises and takes care of cows, which are a source of meat, milk, and leather. Leather from cattle can be used to make drum heads. Therefore, a cattle farmer could potentially provide an essential material for drum making. However, a drum maker could also obtain leather from other sources, so the usefulness of a cattle farmer would depend on the drum maker's specific needs and access to other leather suppliers. ANSWER: The answer is: potentially, depending on the drum maker's needs.,A cattle farmer raises and cares for cattle, including cows. One of the byproducts of raising cows is the generation of cowhide, which can be used as the material for making drums. Therefore, a cattle farmer could provide the raw material necessary for drum makers. The answer is: yes.