Nous

🔍

question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Here is a news article: CLEVELAND, Tennessee- A popular clothing choice for young girls and women was recently put in check by a Tennessee woman who wanted to lay down the proper rules when it comes to wearing leggings. Jamie Higdon Randolph from Cleveland, Tennessee recently posted a sassy video message to her Facebook page directed at women who like to wear ‘leggings.’ In her video titled, “Leggings ain’t pants,” Jamie said she was on her way to buy a new pair of leggings after she couldn’t find her own leggings and went to borrow a pair from her daughter. When Jamie realized those didn’t quite fit she left for the store to get herself a new pair and decided to share her thoughts about the popular fashion trend. “Ladies, it’s pretty much leggin’ weather,’ she says to start off her video. ‘I love leggin’ weather. I don’t care if you don’t like leggins, don’t judge me, they are comfortable. They don’t cut into you, they’re always the right length. You can dress them up, dress them down, you can look like a frat girl or you can look pretty classy in them depending on what you choose to pair with them.” Jamie went on to set the record straight when it comes to how the leg wear should be worn, “Some of you people like to use‪ leggins’ as britches, as pants, pants,” she says. “That’s not how they’re supposed to be worn. ‘If you can’t wear a shirt that covers your tail so that I can’t tell that you got some Aztec-print thongs on, you don’t need to be wearing ’em, sic” she said. Jamie added, if a pair of leggings are so tight that others can see tattoos through them, then they “shouldn’t be worn, period. That’s called pantyhose, honey.” She ended the video with a short summary- “Don’t do it.. You’re welcome!” The video has been viewed on Facebook more than 12 million times. ||||| Four years ago, fashion icon Tim Gunn scoffed when he was asked about the budding trend of people wearing leggings and yoga pants on the street. Nowadays, you can't stride down a sidewalk without seeing all kinds of athletic gear adorning people on their way to the pilates studio, grocery store, or work. Casual clothes have caught on. Heck, you can buy emoji-print leggings at Saks Fifth Avenue. So does Gunn still hate it when people wear those neon racerback tanks or jet black Spandex bottoms on the street? I get a deluge of sass when I ask him. "It's vulgar," says Gunn. "Unless you're Robin Hood." We're inside a tent in the shadow of New York's Flatiron Building for an event with Transitions, the lensmaker he has teamed up with. Ducking away from an endlessly refreshed meet-and-greet line, Gunn is fully buttoned-up, as usual; despite this September day's oppressive humidity, he's armored with a navy double-breasted suit. Gunn knows he's getting older, at 62, and he may sound stubborn, but he insists it's still important to present yourself respectably. Gym clothes won't do. "When did the leggings become a pant?" Gunn asks with an incredulous look. He wholly accepts stretchy leggings the way they were traditionally worn, as a layer underneath whatever else you're wearing. And they're fine while you're working out. Just change before you leave the gym. Comfort isn't an valid excuse, either, says Gunn. There are plenty of clothes you could wear that are cozy— say, a Diane von Furstenburg wrap dress, which has the stretch but remains sleek and chic. Unfortunately, the Project Runway mentor will probably be rolling his eyes for a while; it seems the torrent of Spandex isn't stopping soon. All kinds of fashion labels are now making activewear, hoping to ride the wave, from designer names like Stella McCartney and Tory Burch to such mass market tags as Old Navy and H&M. Activewear is even poking into the luxury realm, with new brands charging 400 or more for their leggings and yoga pants. It comes down to the occasion, Gunn says. Wear what's appropriate for what you're doing. Just as a swimsuit belongs at the pool or the beach, workout gear belongs at the gym, unless you're jogging down a sidewalk. Leggings as pants? You're basically wearing underwear, he says, and how does that make others perceive you? Even if you're just out running errands, what if you run into your boss, or an ex? "That's the thing about overly casual dressing," says Gunn. "It says: 'I don't give a rat's ass about anything.'" ||||| A summary of this is?

answer:The news article discusses the opinions of two individuals, Jamie Higdon Randolph and Tim Gunn, who share concerns about wearing leggings as pants outside of a gym or exercise setting. Jamie Randolph, a Tennessee woman, posted a video on Facebook titled "Leggings ain't pants" that has been viewed over 12 million times. In the video, she humorously advises women not to wear leggings as pants if they cannot cover their behinds with a shirt, and if their leggings are tight enough to see tattoos through, they shouldn't be worn at all. Fashion icon Tim Gunn, formerly skeptical about the trend of wearing leggings and yoga pants on the street, maintains his dislike for it by describing it as "vulgar" in an interview. He also questions when leggings became considered pants and stresses the importance of presenting oneself respectably in public. According to Gunn, comfort is not a valid excuse for wearing leggings as pants, as there are many other comfortable clothing options like wrap dresses. Despite these opinions, it seems that the trend of wearing activewear as regular clothing will continue, with many fashion labels, including luxury brands, producing leggings and yoga pants. Gunn emphasizes that clothing should be appropriate for the occasion, and overly casual dressing may give off the impression that one does not care about anything. In summary, the article highlights the perspectives of two individuals who disapprove of wearing leggings as pants outside of exercise settings, arguing for maintaining a respectable appearance in public., A Tennessee woman, Jamie Higdon Randolph, posted a viral video on her Facebook page expressing her thoughts on how leggings should be properly worn, stating that they should not be used as a replacement for pants and should be covered by a shirt that is long enough to hide any underwear lines or tattoos. The video has been viewed over 12 million times. Meanwhile, fashion icon Tim Gunn has criticized the trend of wearing leggings and yoga pants as streetwear, stating that it is "vulgar" and that gym clothes should not be worn outside of the gym. He argues that there are plenty of other comfortable clothing options available and that it's important to present yourself respectably. This trend of wearing athletic wear as streetwear has been on the rise in recent years and is not limited to just budget-friendly brands, with even luxury labels now offering activewear. Gunn emphasizes the importance of dressing appropriately for the occasion and not wearing workout gear outside of the gym.,A Tennessee woman named Jamie Higdon Randolph, a.k.a. a local resident from Cleveland, recently took to Facebook to express her thoughts and set some rules as to how women should be wearing leggings. In a sassy video message titled "Leggings ain't pants," she pointed out her concerns with women who wear leggings as pants as she believed it is a fashion trend that needs to be fixed. She especially advised against wearing leggings with revealing tops. The video amassed around 12 million views on Facebook. On the other hand, fashion icon Tim Gunn has long been vocal about his distaste for leggings worn outside intended settings such as gym and casual wear. He thinks it is "vulgar" and believes people should opt for clothes that are both stylish and appropriate for different situations. Comfort should not be an excuse, according to Gunn, as there are plenty of choices that are stretchy yet classy, like a Diane von Furstenburg wrap dress. As more fashion labels produce activewear for both luxury and mass markets, Tim Gunn emphasizes that it is crucial to wear these kinds of clothing according to the situation.

question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Generate a short summary this sentence: europe 's top football managers maintained the pressure friday for more flexibility over international match scheduling to stop burnout in their squads .

answer:Big bosses of soccer in Europe want changes to make it easier to schedule important games. They think this will help players not get very tired and injured., The biggest soccer coaches in Europe want a change in when big soccer games between countries are played. They think that right now, there are too many games and it's making the players tired. They hope that by changing when the games are played, the players will have more energy and won't get tired out.,Europe's best soccer leaders want to change when national team games happen, so their players don't get too tired from playing too much.

question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Question 1: What is that song which gives you goosebumps? Question 2: Which song gives you goosebumps when you hear it every-time? Why? Possible answers: a. no b. yes Are questions 1 and 2 asking the same thing?

answer:Questions 1 and 2 are essentially asking the same thing. They both inquire about a particular song that gives you goosebumps when you hear it. However, there is a slight difference in the way they are phrased. Question 1: "What is that song which gives you goosebumps?" This question is phrased more like a straightforward inquiry about a song that often causes goosebumps. The question assumes that there is one specific song that has this effect on the person being asked and that the song may be more or less consistent. Question 2: "Which song gives you goosebumps when you hear it every time? Why?" This question is asking not only about a song that causes goosebumps but also expresses interest in understanding the specific reasons for that emotional reaction. By including the phrase "every time" and asking "why," the question delves deeper into the consistency of the impact of the song on the person and the underlying reasons behind the powerful emotional response. In conclusion, although the two questions are quite similar in nature, they vary slightly in their focus and emphasis. Both questions inquire about a song that causes goosebumps; however, question 2 seeks an explanation as to why that particular song consistently has that impact on the person being asked., Questions 1 and 2 are similar, but not exactly the same. Both questions are asking about a song that evokes a physical reaction in the form of goosebumps, but question 2 includes an additional aspect by asking about the consistency of this reaction. To answer question 1, I am an AI language model and do not have personal experiences or physical sensations, so I cannot get goosebumps. However, I can generate a list of songs that are commonly reported to give people goosebumps due to their emotional impact, powerful lyrics, or moving melodies. Some examples include: * "Hallelujah" by Leonard Cohen * "Bohemian Rhapsody" by Queen * "Imagine" by John Lennon * "Stairway to Heaven" by Led Zeppelin * "Someone Like You" by Adele * "Fix You" by Coldplay * "I Will Always Love You" by Whitney Houston * "With or Without You" by U2 * "The Sound of Silence" by Simon & Garfunkel * "No Woman, No Cry" by Bob Marley To answer question 2, I cannot personally experience goosebumps. However, I can analyze song lyrics, structure, and the emotional responses they typically evoke in listeners. Based on this analysis, there are several songs that are often mentioned as consistently giving people goosebumps, such as: * "Hallelujah" by Leonard Cohen, with its powerful and emotional lyrics, has been known to evoke goosebumps due to its strong vocal delivery and poignant storytelling. * "Imagine" by John Lennon, with its message of unity and hope, moves many people and creates an emotional reaction leading to goosebumps. * "Someone Like You" by Adele, with its raw and heartfelt emotion, has been known to evoke goosebumps in listeners due to its powerful vocal performance and relatable lyrics. In summary, questions 1 and 2 are asking about a song that can give someone goosebumps, but question 2 has an additional focus on the consistency of this reaction. Many songs can trigger goosebumps due to their emotional impact, powerful lyrics, or moving melodies. Some examples of songs that have been reported to consistently give listeners goosebumps include "Hallelujah" by Leonard Cohen, "Imagine" by John Lennon, and "Someone Like You" by Adele.,While questions 1 and 2 appear similar, they don't necessarily ask the exact same thing. Question 1 is specifically asking for the name of the song that gives you goosebumps, without delving into any deeper explanation or reasoning behind this feeling. On the other hand, Question 2 goes a bit further than just asking for a song title. It asks which song makes you feel goosebumps every time you hear it, but also requires an explanation as to why the song has this effect on you. So, although both questions relate to music and goosebumps, question 1 seeks a song name and doesn't require additional context, whereas question 2 seeks a song name along with an explanation of why the song impacts you in this way. Therefore, the two questions are not alike in their complete context and scope.

question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Thursday ? ? is n't it supposed to be Tuesday ? today , Tuesday 9 , i supposed to go to Suwon ( for sightseeing with other foreigners ) and there 'll be dinner party ... Yes I do remember that 's tuesday 9 .. After couple of minutes I realized ...... OMG~~~it 's Sept ta ! ! ! so I recalled previous ODB ... Geee ... i read for the Oct for 3 days , instead of Sept ... So ta ... .this is September ! ! ! ! Generate a question about the above context.

answer:Why did you think it was Tuesday 9th, but then realized it was actually September 9th?, I'm excited to hear about your plans for Tuesday! It seems like there was a little mix-up with the months, and you realized that the day you need to go to Suwon is actually in September, not October. So my question is: Can you tell me what fun activities you are looking forward to doing in Suwon on Tuesday?,Hey buddy, do you want to know if they accidentally thought it was October instead of September and almost missed their sightseeing trip to Suwon that was supposed to happen on Tuesday the 9th?